亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

CERES-Wheat模型中兩種蒸發(fā)蒸騰量估算方法比較研究
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:

“十二五”國(guó)家科技支撐計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(2011BAD29B01)和國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(51179162)


Comparison of Two Crop Evapotranspiration Calculating Approaches in CSM-CERES-Wheat Model
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問(wèn)統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    基于CSM-CERES-Wheat模型中Priestley-Taylor (PT)和FAO56 Penman-Monteith (PM)2種蒸發(fā)蒸騰量估算方法分別模擬了冬小麥2011—2012年和2012—2013年2個(gè)生長(zhǎng)季的累積蒸發(fā)蒸騰量、日蒸發(fā)蒸騰量、土壤含水率、地上干物質(zhì)以及籽粒產(chǎn)量,并對(duì)2種方法的模擬結(jié)果進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià)和比較。對(duì)2種方法模擬的蒸發(fā)蒸騰量值與試驗(yàn)區(qū)域內(nèi)大型稱量式蒸滲儀的實(shí)測(cè)結(jié)果進(jìn)行了比較,結(jié)果表明,基于PT和PM方法的CERES-Wheat模型均可以準(zhǔn)確地模擬干旱-半干旱地區(qū)冬小麥的蒸發(fā)蒸騰量,累積蒸發(fā)蒸騰量和日蒸發(fā)蒸騰量的誤差分別小于5.4%和3.4%。同時(shí),模型還可以模擬土壤水分動(dòng)態(tài)情況,在0~20cm土層,CERES-Wheat模型的模擬值與實(shí)測(cè)值的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化均方根誤差(RRMSEn)為39.38%,模擬結(jié)果較差,但20cm土層以下,2種方法的模擬值與實(shí)測(cè)值的RRMSEn均小于23.1%,且對(duì)40~60cm土層的模擬結(jié)果最好。CERES-Wheat模型基于PT和PM方法對(duì)冬小麥在2011—2012年和2012—2013年生長(zhǎng)季地上生物量的模擬值與實(shí)測(cè)值的RRMSEn分別為13.57%和22.76%,產(chǎn)量的RRMSEn分別為11.80%和15.42%,模擬結(jié)果均較好。另外,CSM-CERES-Wheat模型基于PT方法模擬的蒸發(fā)蒸騰量小于基于PM方法的模擬值,而PT方法對(duì)土壤含水率的模擬結(jié)果高于PM方法的模擬結(jié)果,且PT方法對(duì)地上生物量以及產(chǎn)量的模擬結(jié)果高于PM方法,用2種方法模擬的成熟期地上生物量及產(chǎn)量的RRMSEn值均在25%以內(nèi)??傊?,CSM-CERES-Wheat模型采用2種方法對(duì)蒸發(fā)蒸騰量、土壤含水率及干物質(zhì)和產(chǎn)量的模擬結(jié)果均較好,表明該模型在我國(guó)干旱-半干旱地區(qū)的應(yīng)用性較好,可為該地區(qū)不同水分條件下冬小麥的生長(zhǎng)情況提供理論支持。

    Abstract:

    Crop water requirement is one of the most important factors in farmland water circulatory system, its accurate estimates could help with crop irrigation management. The ability of simulating evapotranspiration (ET) for CSM-CERES-Wheat model is very important, which determines the accuracy of model output parameters. The objective was to evaluate the capability of CSM-CERES-Wheat model to simulate the cumulative evapotranspiration, daily evapotranspiration and soil water content of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in 2011—2012 and 2012—2013 growing seasons under semiarid condition. The daily ET was measured by using weighing lysimeter that installed in the experimental plot. The ability of CSM-CERES-Wheat model by using two different ET calculating approaches, i.e., Priestley-Taylor (PT) and Penman-Monteith (PM), and the simulation results were evaluated and compared. Data were obtained from two experiments with three irrigation levels that were conducted under controlled condition in a rain-out shelter in Yanling, Shaanxi Province of China during the 2011—2012 and 2012—2013 growing seasons. Results showed that the simulated cumulative ET, daily ET and soil water content of CSM-CERES-Wheat model with both PT and PM approaches had great agreement with measured values, and the simulated cumulative ET and daily ET were 5.4% and 3.4% less than those of observed values, respectively. The CSM-CERES-Wheat model simulated cumulative ET for winter wheat in two growing seasons through PT approach was less than that through PM approach, the relative difference between two approaches was ranged from -3.11% to -0.05%. The model could simulate soil water content correctly as well, in the depth of 0~20cm soil layer, the RMSEn between simulated results based on two ET approaches and observed values was 39.38%, which was relatively high and not good, but below the 20cm soil depth, the RMSEn between simulation results that based on two ET approaches and observed values was less than 23.1%, and the simulation results in depth of 40~60cm soil layer got the best agreement with the observed values. The model with both PT and PM approaches simulated the above-ground biomass and grain yield accurately as well. The RMSEn of final above-ground biomass for two growing seasons were 13.57% for PT approach and 22.76% for PM approach, and RMSEn of grain yield were 11.80% for PT approach and 15.42% for PM approach, both of the simulated results had good agreement with observed values. The model using PT approach provided smaller ET and higher soil water content than those derived from PM approach as compared with measured data. Additionally, the model using PT approach provided higher final above-ground biomass and grain yield than those derived from PM approach as compared with measured data. However, the model with both two approaches could simulate the total above-ground biomass and grain yield with RMSEn within 25% of measured data. Overall, it can be concluded that the CSM-CERES-Wheat model using the two different approaches, i.e., PT and PM, was able to accurately simulate winter wheat ET and soil water content. The results also confirmed that the model could be applied in arid and semi-arid areas, and it can be used as a tool for agricultural water management and supplying the decision support for winter wheat growth in Guanzhong Plain.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

鄭珍,蔡煥杰,虞連玉,王健. CERES-Wheat模型中兩種蒸發(fā)蒸騰量估算方法比較研究[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械學(xué)報(bào),2016,47(8):179-191. Zheng Zhen, Cai Huanjie, Yu Lianyu, Wang Jian. Comparison of Two Crop Evapotranspiration Calculating Approaches in CSM-CERES-Wheat Model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2016,47(8):179-191.

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2016-08-10
  • 出版日期: 2016-08-10