亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

東北稻區(qū)不同秸稈還田模式機(jī)具作業(yè)效果研究
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:

國(guó)家重點(diǎn)研發(fā)計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(2016YFD0300909-03)和教育部創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)發(fā)展計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(IRT13039)


Performance of Straw Returning Equipment under Different Mechanized Straw Returning Pattern in Northeast Rice Area
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    水稻秸稈還田是培肥地力、增產(chǎn)增效的重要方式。東北稻區(qū)存在秸稈量大、收獲時(shí)秸稈含水率低、切碎拋撒難等問題,既影響秸稈還田質(zhì)量,又進(jìn)一步影響后期耕整地和插秧作業(yè)質(zhì)量,亟需研究適用于東北稻區(qū)的機(jī)械化秸稈還田模式,改善秸稈還田和耕整地作業(yè)質(zhì)量,支撐水稻秸稈還田技術(shù)的應(yīng)用。本研究在黑龍江省七星農(nóng)場(chǎng)開展機(jī)械化秸稈還田試驗(yàn),共設(shè)4種模式,即:對(duì)照CK(秸稈不還田,秋翻+春攪漿)、還田處理1(秸稈還田,秋翻+春攪漿)、還田處理2(秸稈還田,秋翻、秋旋+春平地)、還田處理3(秸稈還田,秋旋埋+春平地)。試驗(yàn)選取不同模式各作業(yè)環(huán)節(jié)的配套機(jī)具,并監(jiān)測(cè)不同模式的秸稈還田和耕整地機(jī)具作業(yè)效果。2年的試驗(yàn)檢測(cè)表明,3種秸稈還田模式均能實(shí)現(xiàn)秸稈全量還田,并滿足水稻插秧前的地表作業(yè)要求,能夠保證正常的插秧作業(yè)和水稻返青。其中,還田處理3的綜合還田效果相對(duì)最優(yōu),能實(shí)現(xiàn)較好的地表平整度、泥漿度和植被覆蓋率;還田處理2與還田處理1相比,增加秋季旋耕作業(yè),春季改用無動(dòng)力平地作業(yè),2年的數(shù)據(jù)尚未顯示能顯著改善插秧前地表狀況。

    Abstract:

    Rice straw returning to the field is an effective way to improve fertility and increase yield. However, the large amount of straw, low water content during harvesting and the difficulty in chopping and scattering all have a negative effects on straw returning, moreover reduce the quality of tillage and transplanting operations in the northeast rice area. It is urgent to investigate a suitable straw returning pattern, improve the quality of straw returning and tillage operations and support the application of rice straw returning technology in the northeast rice area. Aiming to solve these problems, a two-year straw returning experiment was carried out in Qixing Farm in Heilongjiang Province. Four treatments were taken into consideration, including CK (no straw returning, autumn plowing + spring puddling), returning treatment 1 (straw returning, autumn plowing + spring puddling), returning treatment 2 (straw returning, autumn plowing, autumn rotary + spring leveling), and returning treatment 3 (straw returning, autumn rotation buried + spring leveling). Matching equipment was selected for the different patterns and the effects of straw returning and tilling were measured. The two-year experiment showed that all the three straw returning patterns could realize the full amount straw returning, and conditions of soil surface after straw returning could meet the requirement of rice transplanting, in other words it could ensure the quality of rice transplanting and greening up. It could be concluded that returning treatment 3 had a better performance, which meant that it could achieve better surface flatness, slurry degree and vegetation coverage. Two-year experiment results showed that compared with returning treatment 1, treatment 2 did not significantly improve the soil conditions before rice transplanting, although rotation was added in autumn and leveling replaced stirring in spring.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

孫妮娜,王曉燕,李洪文,彭顯龍,王將,王慶杰.東北稻區(qū)不同秸稈還田模式機(jī)具作業(yè)效果研究[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械學(xué)報(bào),2018,49(s1):68-74,154. SUN Nina, WANG Xiaoyan, LI Hongwen, PENG Xianlong, WANG Jiang, WANG Qingjie. Performance of Straw Returning Equipment under Different Mechanized Straw Returning Pattern in Northeast Rice Area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2018,49(s1):68-74,154.

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2018-11-10
  • 出版日期:
文章二維碼