亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

基于無人機LiDAR的天然林與人工林林隙提取
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:

國家重點研發(fā)計劃項目(2017YFD0600902)和中央高?;究蒲袠I(yè)務費專項資金項目(2572018BA02)


Extraction of Forest Gaps in Natural Forest and Man-made Forest Based on UAV LiDAR
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    為研究主動遙感進行森林地物分類和林隙提取的效果,分別在天然林和人工林中比較了無人機激光雷達(LiDAR)數(shù)據(jù)的閾值法、逐像元法和面向對象法3種方法的分類精度和適用性。選取天然林(黑龍江省哈爾濱市帽兒山林場)和人工林(內蒙古自治區(qū)赤峰市旺業(yè)甸林場)兩處試驗區(qū),應用閾值法、逐像元法和面向對象法3種方法,對兩個試驗區(qū)采集的無人機LiDAR數(shù)據(jù)進行林隙、非林隙、其他類型劃分。研究結果表明,面向對象法在天然林和人工林試驗區(qū)中的分類精度和Kappa系數(shù)均最高,天然林為82.43%、0.73,人工林為91.74%、0.88;逐像元法次之,天然林為76.62%、0.64,人工林為78.68%、0.68;閾值法的分類精度和Kappa系數(shù)差異較大,在天然林中的精度極低,為50.54%、0.27,人工林的精度較高,為79.12%、0.69。面向對象法和逐像元法在天然林和人工林普遍適用,均可以達到理想的分類精度和Kappa系數(shù)。閾值法在天然林的精度較低,更適合于人工林的分類,即林分高度趨于一致,且建筑、道路等其他類型干擾較少的區(qū)域。天然林的最佳分類方法為面向對象法,人工林的最佳分類方法為閾值法。

    Abstract:

    Aiming to explore results of classification and extraction of forest gaps in forest based on active remote sensing, the classification accuracy and applicability of the threshold method were compared, including the pixeloriented method and the objectoriented method in natural forest and man-made forest based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) light detection and ranging (LiDAR). Maoershan Forest Farm in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province and Wangyedian Forest Farm in Chifeng, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region were selected as the natural forest experimental site and the manmade forest experimental site respectively. The threshold method, the pixel-oriented method and the object-oriented method were applied to classify the two experimental sites into three classes based on UAV LiDAR acquired, which were forest gap, nonforest gap and others. The research results indicated that the object-oriented method produced the highest classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient in both experimental sites, which were 82.43% and 0.73 in natural forest and 91.74% and 0.88 in man-made forest, respectively. The accuracy and Kappa coefficient of the pixel-oriented method was lower than that of the objectoriented method, which was 76.62% and 0.64 in natural forest and 78.68% and 0.68 in man-made forest. The accuracy and Kappa coefficient of the threshold method had larger difference. It produced the lowest accuracy in natural forest (50.54% and 0.27) and the higher accuracy in man-made forest (79.12% and 0.69). The objectoriented method and the pixel-oriented method were the methods with general applicability in classification of natural forest and man-made forest and could produce ideal accuracy and Kappa coefficient. The threshold method produced lower accuracy in natural forest and was more suitable for classification of man-made forest, forest height of which was similar and where others such as buildings and roads were rare. The best classification method of natural forest was the object-oriented method and the best of man-made forest was the threshold method. The research results provided method reference and technology support for extraction of forest gaps in natural forest and man-made forest.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

毛學剛,杜子涵,劉家倩,陳樹新.基于無人機LiDAR的天然林與人工林林隙提取[J].農業(yè)機械學報,2020,51(3):232-240. MAO Xuegang, DU Zihan, LIU Jiaqian, CHEN Shuxin. Extraction of Forest Gaps in Natural Forest and Man-made Forest Based on UAV LiDAR[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2020,51(3):232-240.

復制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2020-03-10
  • 出版日期: