亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

河套灌區(qū)控制排水對(duì)油葵生長(zhǎng)與養(yǎng)分利用的影響
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:

國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(51879132、51769024)、內(nèi)蒙古科技重大專項(xiàng)(zdzx2018059)和內(nèi)蒙古水利科技重大專項(xiàng)(nsk2018-M5)


Effect of Controlled Drainage on Oil Sunflower Growth and Nutrient Utilization in Hetao Irrigation District
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    為系統(tǒng)地從土壤水分、鹽分、養(yǎng)分和油葵生長(zhǎng)的變化來揭示不同排水方式的調(diào)控效應(yīng),設(shè)置4個(gè)處理,生育期暗管控制排水深度分別為40cm(K1)、70cm(K2)、100cm(K3),春灌排水深度均為100cm,選擇明溝排水(深度150cm)作為對(duì)照處理(CK),開展了田間試驗(yàn)。結(jié)果表明:K1處理自油葵開花期到收獲1m土層平均儲(chǔ)水量比K2、K3處理提高了0.01%~4.53%,為作物生長(zhǎng)后期提供了有效的水分。K1處理穩(wěn)定了土壤水消耗的速率,削弱了水平方向土壤水分的消耗差異。春灌后K1、K2、K3處理平均脫鹽率分別為49.02%、50.43%、49.70%,處理間無顯著差異,而明溝排水僅為35.52%。暗管排水處理暗管中間點(diǎn)與暗管上土壤鹽分淋洗率相差7.1~8.2個(gè)百分點(diǎn),處理間無顯著差異。CK處理鹽分淋洗差異性相對(duì)較小,距明溝0.4m處與明溝中間點(diǎn)相差2.8個(gè)百分點(diǎn)。至生育后期(開花期)不同處理存在土壤返鹽情況,K1、K2、K3、CK較春灌前平均返鹽率分別為28.63%、24.20%、20.83%、22.07%。K1、K2處理返鹽程度相對(duì)較高,但其含鹽量不影響油葵后期正常生長(zhǎng)。K1處理在現(xiàn)蕾期銨態(tài)氮含量顯著高于其他處理(P<0.05),較K2、K3、CK處理高30.43%、45.90%、14.83%;開花期銨態(tài)氮含量由大到小依次為K1、CK、K2、K3,差異性小于成熟期;成熟期K1、K2處理銨態(tài)氮含量與CK處理無顯著差異。硝態(tài)氮含量在現(xiàn)蕾期、開花期和成熟期含量K1處理最高,K1處理較K2、K3、CK處理分別高13.62%~30.80%、14.33%~53.09%、7.17%~28.10%(P<0.05)。K1處理可減小地下水位波動(dòng),使氮素以穩(wěn)定形態(tài)存在,減少硝態(tài)氮流失。暗管排水可以提高油葵出苗率2.5~2.7個(gè)百分點(diǎn)。K1處理增加有效株占比2.3~5.0個(gè)百分點(diǎn);油葵出苗50d后能顯著增加株高5.10%~14.87%、莖粗6.29%~22.46%;提高水分利用效率1.16%~10.8%;提高氮磷鉀肥料偏生產(chǎn)力7.69%~11.16%;增產(chǎn)4.52%~11.14%;并且有效地提高了葉片光合能力。從對(duì)土壤控鹽、保肥、穩(wěn)產(chǎn)與水肥利用效率多角度綜合分析,春灌排水深度100cm,生育期控制排水深度40cm(K1)的控制排水方式是適宜的選擇。

    Abstract:

    Aiming to systematically reveal the regulatory effects of different drainage methods from the growth of oil sunflowers and the changes in soil moisture, salinity and nutrients, four treatments were set up, i.e., the control drainage depth during the growth period was 40cm (K1), 70cm (K2), 100cm (K3), and the spring irrigation drainage depth was 100cm. Open ditch drainage(depth 150cm) was selected as the control treatment (CK), and field trials were carried out. The results showed that the average water storage of 1m soil layer from the flowering period of the oil sunflower to the harvest of K1 treatment was increased by 0.01%~4.53% compared with that of K2 and K3 treatments, which provided effective water for the later stage of crop growth. K1 treatment stabilized the rate of soil water consumption and weakened the difference in soil water consumption in the horizontal direction. After spring irrigation, the average desalination rates of K1, K2, and K3 treatments were 49.02%, 50.43%, and 49.70%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between treatments, but the open ditch drainage was only 35.52%. The desalination rate was inversely proportional to the horizontal distance from the concealed pipe (open ditch). The intermediate point of the concealed pipe drainage treatment and the soil salt leaching effect on the concealed pipe were 7.1~8.2 percentage points, and there was no significant difference between treatments. Salt leaching difference of CK treatment was relatively small, the difference between 0.4m from the open ditch and the middle point of the open ditch was 2.8 percentage points. In the late growth period (flowering period), the soil salinity return was more serious. In the late growth period (flowering period), different treatments had soil salt return. The average salt return rates of K1, K2, K3, and CK were 28.63%, 24.20%, 20.83%, and 22.07%, respectively. K1 and K2 treatments had relatively high salinity return, but their content did not affect the normal growth of oil sunflower in the later stage. The content of ammonium nitrogen in the control drainage 40cm (K1) during the budding stage was significantly higher than that of other treatments (P<0.05), and was 30.43%, 45.90%, 14.83% higher than that of K2, K3, and CK treatments. The ammonium nitrogen content in the flowering stage was K1, CK, K2, and K3 in descending order, and the difference was smaller than that in the mature stage; there was no significant difference in ammonium nitrogen content between K1 and K2 treatments at maturity stage and CK treatment. The content of nitrate nitrogen was the highest in the budding stage, flowering stage and maturity stage of K1 treatment, which was 13.62%~30.80%, 14.33%~53.09%, 7.17%~28.10% higher than that of K2, K3 and CK treatments, respectively(P<0.05). Controlled drainage can reduce groundwater level fluctuations, make nitrogen exist in a stable form, and reduce the loss of nitrate nitrogen. Controlled drainage can increase the seedling rate of oil sunflower by 2.5~2.7 percentage points. K1 treatment increased the percentage of effective plants by 2.3~5.0 percentage points, oil sunflower can significantly increase plant height by 5.10%~14.87% and stem thickness by 6.29%~22.46% after 50 days of unearthed, increase water use efficiency by 1.16%~10.8%, increase the partial productivity of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers by 7.69%~11.16%, increase production by 4.52%~11.14%, and effectively improve the photosynthetic capacity of the leaves. From the comprehensive analysis of soil salt control, fertilizer preservation, stable production and water and fertilizer use efficiency, the controlled drainage method of spring irrigation and drainage depth of 100cm and controlled drainage depth during growth period of 40cm (K1) was a suitable choice.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

竇旭,史海濱,李瑞平,苗慶豐,田峰,于丹丹.河套灌區(qū)控制排水對(duì)油葵生長(zhǎng)與養(yǎng)分利用的影響[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械學(xué)報(bào),2021,52(12):313-323. DOU Xu, SHI Haibin, LI Ruiping, MIAO Qingfeng, TIAN Feng, YU Dandan. Effect of Controlled Drainage on Oil Sunflower Growth and Nutrient Utilization in Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2021,52(12):313-323.

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2021-01-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二維碼